Places I have slept
(a series of drawings)
began August 3, 2003
ended November 21, 2003:
  1. Hayward
  2. Castro Valley
  3. San Lorenzo
  4. San Ramon
  5. Sacramento
  6. Carmichael
  7. San Jose
  8. Oakland
  9. Santa Cruz
  10. Monterey
  11. Pacific Grove
  12. San Simeon
  13. Calistoga
  14. Occidental
  15. Russian River
  16. Jenner
  17. Sea Ranch
  18. Garberville
  19. Gualala
  20. Yorkville, Anderson Valley (Sheep Dung Estates)
  21. One night B&B near Mendocino
  22. Olema
  23. Inverness
  24. Half Moon Bay
  25. Clear Lake
  26. Tahoe
  27. Northstar
  28. Reno
  29. Shasta
  30. Los Angeles
  31. Anaheim
  32. Hollywood
  33. Long Beach
  34. Pasadena
  35. San Diego
  36. San Bernadino
  37. Las Vegas
  38. Yosemite
  39. El Portal
  40. Tuolumne Meadows
  41. Death Valley
  42. Lone Pine
  43. Mono Lake
  44. June Lake
  45. Lake Isabella
  46. Bridgeport
  47. Hope Valley
  48. Crystal Bay, NV
  49. Tehachapi
  50. Victorville
  51. Needles
  52. Winton
  53. Modesto
  54. Twain Harte
  55. Shasta- II
  56. a whole bunch of little towns and campsites all over California
    1. McCloud River
    2. Camp Curry
    3. Barstow
    4. Mojave
    5. Verde Antique
    6. Santa Barbara
    7. Angel Island
    8. Steep Ravine
    9. Clear Lake 2
    10. Mt. Lassen
    11. Big Sur
    12. more more more
  57. Seattle
  58. Portland
  59. Ashland
  60. Corvallis
  61. Victoria
  62. Minneapolis
  63. Carlsbad (CA & NM)
  64. Albuquerque
  65. Santa Fe
  66. Gallup
  67. San Antonio
  68. Lubbock, home of Buddy Holly and Aunt Evelyn
  69. Harlingen
  70. New Orleans
  71. Atlanta
  72. West Monroe, LA
  73. New York
  74. Kapaa
  75. a beach in San Felipe, Baja
  76. Mazatlan
  77. Puerto Vallarta
  78. Barra de Navidad
  79. London
  80. Sheffield
  81. Dover
  82. Rye
  83. Cambridge
  84. York
  85. Edinburgh
  86. Glasgow
  87. Cardiff
  88. Dublin
  89. Mullaghbawn
  90. Dromore West
  91. Clifden
  92. Galway
  93. Corofin
  94. Inisheer
  95. Quin
  96. Kildare
  97. Belfast
  98. Brussels
  99. Amsterdam
  100. Stockholm
  101. Oslo
  102. Copenhagen
  103. Bonn
  104. Munich
  105. Baumholder
  106. Hamburg
  107. Vienna
  108. Zurich
  109. Le Havre
  110. Rouen
  111. Paris
  112. Florence
  113. Padua
  114. Airplanes over the Atlantic & Pacific
    1. TWA
    2. United
    3. British
    4. Virgin
    5. People's Express
    6. Alaskan
    7. Mexicana
    8. Southwest
a place to work, nothing fancy

Calistoga 100803

                             
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
     
     
 
     
     
 
     
     
 
     
     
 

Calistoga

*

To look at/read later: Gunther Forg

*

Interview with teacher, curator, critic Dave Hickey in the Denver Post:

Q: What gets left out of both of those scenarios (art writing) is the art itself, particularly the art object.

A: Well, of course. Art objects are basically what interest me. My principle is always that people are (jerks) and ideas are smoke. Just give me an object any time.

It (object-making) will become a discourse of enthusiasts. It will maintain in culture the kind of status that jazz has. I really think the world of object-making is receding into that kind of marginal status, which, in a sense, is OK for me. That's the status it had when I was a kid.

I've talked with others about this recently. I believe the hand-made art object will attain a status of importance and rarity with specialized audiences, and while new media art will grow (video, installation, internet-based, digital images, etc.), and with it the audiences, new media art will be an art with a whole different experience and meaning from object art. New media art will be potentially more easily accessible, the boundaries blurring between the art and consumer media. And because much of this art is game and entertainment-based it is often a one-off experience. For me, good art is about repeated viewings.

In the meantime object-based art will always require education, time, and the active engagement of the viewer, something many viewers just won't give readily to static objects. The issue of engagement for much new media art depends less on time and education, since so much now uses media familiar from the cradle: photographs, video, film language, narrative, popular themes, a stage set environment, lighting and sound from theater, etc.

When I have referred in the past to my desire for a more elite art, I mean an art that demands of the viewer a non technology-mediated engagement, that uses the eye, that requires the time-based experience of seeing and knowledge that extends over years, even a lifetime, that requires education, reflection, repeated viewing. My feeling is that the more machines do for us the less grounded we are, and the less grounded we are, the less we see and feel.

I am interested in an art of seeing and feeling, and the intellectual processing and cognition of the experience of seeing and feeling. I am interested in an art that doesn't come and go in and out of style in 3-5 year cycles, that doesn't require new machinery and upgrades, that stands still and looks back at me. A 3,000 pot needs a pedestal, and doesn't really need more than that except a little security; new media art has the issue of it's existence- a video on tape, transferred to DVD, that will need to adapt to future technologies just to experience it can still have value, but it is so far removed from my breath and blink that for me it is not a solid experience.

Q: What are some of the ways that you see the art world has changed in the last 20 years?

A: Art's just not that important or that fashionable anymore. It's not cool. Not only that, it's not intellectually serious. But art gets sold.

I just talked to a friend of mine who came back from New York, and he said, 'I didn't see anything but C-prints (a type of color photograph).' They're all going to turn green, which makes them terrible collector objects. And they're all really boring.

What do you do with an art world in which the normative work of art is a giant C-print of three Germans standing beside a mailbox. What's that? Stop it, please.

This example sounds like a joke, however it is not an extreme exaggeration.

*

I have no faith in a political process, national or state-based, that is stuck in the machinery of the two-party system. This, to me, is a fault still with even well-intentioned movements like moveon.org. Our governments are in ruts, and the process is corrupt. I also have no faith anymore in an electorate that is impatient and can't follow rules, and sees issues as black and white. I am disillusioned by the superficiality of yesterday's election. I don't believe the media. I am disappointed with the cost of housing. I feel threatened by our health care system. I am bored with the forty hour work week. It's too crowded. I hate the sound of bass-heavy hip hop from cars on the street. My knee hurts. A really good organic tomato requires a down payment. Yakety yak yak yak, blah blah blah.

Say...


The opinions or statements expressed herein should not be taken as a position of or endorsement by the University of California, Berkeley. Nor should the opinions or statements expressed herein be taken as a position of or endorsement of the University of California, Berkeley. Links on these pages to commercial sites do not represent endorsement by the University of California or its affiliates.

[© Christopher Ashley]

Archives
October 2003
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 

Sep   Nov

home
HTMLdrawings
~ ~ ~
aboutHTMLdrawings
portfolio
(external site)
writings
readings
weblogs
IU
links
whoami
LookSee
an artblog
AtWork
a workblog


Readers may leave a comment


This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
since 111702
Powered by counter.bloke.com