Places I have slept
(a series of drawings)
began August 3, 2003
ended November 21, 2003:
  1. Hayward
  2. Castro Valley
  3. San Lorenzo
  4. San Ramon
  5. Sacramento
  6. Carmichael
  7. San Jose
  8. Oakland
  9. Santa Cruz
  10. Monterey
  11. Pacific Grove
  12. San Simeon
  13. Calistoga
  14. Occidental
  15. Russian River
  16. Jenner
  17. Sea Ranch
  18. Garberville
  19. Gualala
  20. Yorkville, Anderson Valley (Sheep Dung Estates)
  21. One night B&B near Mendocino
  22. Olema
  23. Inverness
  24. Half Moon Bay
  25. Clear Lake
  26. Tahoe
  27. Northstar
  28. Reno
  29. Shasta
  30. Los Angeles
  31. Anaheim
  32. Hollywood
  33. Long Beach
  34. Pasadena
  35. San Diego
  36. San Bernadino
  37. Las Vegas
  38. Yosemite
  39. El Portal
  40. Tuolumne Meadows
  41. Death Valley
  42. Lone Pine
  43. Mono Lake
  44. June Lake
  45. Lake Isabella
  46. Bridgeport
  47. Hope Valley
  48. Crystal Bay, NV
  49. Tehachapi
  50. Victorville
  51. Needles
  52. Winton
  53. Modesto
  54. Twain Harte
  55. Shasta- II
  56. a whole bunch of little towns and campsites all over California
    1. McCloud River
    2. Camp Curry
    3. Barstow
    4. Mojave
    5. Verde Antique
    6. Santa Barbara
    7. Angel Island
    8. Steep Ravine
    9. Clear Lake 2
    10. Mt. Lassen
    11. Big Sur
    12. more more more
  57. Seattle
  58. Portland
  59. Ashland
  60. Corvallis
  61. Victoria
  62. Minneapolis
  63. Carlsbad (CA & NM)
  64. Albuquerque
  65. Santa Fe
  66. Gallup
  67. San Antonio
  68. Lubbock, home of Buddy Holly and Aunt Evelyn
  69. Harlingen
  70. New Orleans
  71. Atlanta
  72. West Monroe, LA
  73. New York
  74. Kapaa
  75. a beach in San Felipe, Baja
  76. Mazatlan
  77. Puerto Vallarta
  78. Barra de Navidad
  79. London
  80. Sheffield
  81. Dover
  82. Rye
  83. Cambridge
  84. York
  85. Edinburgh
  86. Glasgow
  87. Cardiff
  88. Dublin
  89. Mullaghbawn
  90. Dromore West
  91. Clifden
  92. Galway
  93. Corofin
  94. Inisheer
  95. Quin
  96. Kildare
  97. Belfast
  98. Brussels
  99. Amsterdam
  100. Stockholm
  101. Oslo
  102. Copenhagen
  103. Bonn
  104. Munich
  105. Baumholder
  106. Hamburg
  107. Vienna
  108. Zurich
  109. Le Havre
  110. Rouen
  111. Paris
  112. Florence
  113. Padua
  114. Airplanes over the Atlantic & Pacific
    1. TWA
    2. United
    3. British
    4. Virgin
    5. People's Express
    6. Alaskan
    7. Mexicana
    8. Southwest
a place to work, nothing fancy

Gallery View IX

Friday, January 17, 2003

gallery9.jpg: Images from <a href="http://iu.berkeley.edu/CA/2002/04/13">041302</a>. <a href="http://iu.berkeley.edu/CA/2002/04/14">041402</a>, <a href="http://iu.berkeley.edu/CA/2002/05/08">050802</a>.

Images from 041302, 041402, 050802.

*

Peter Ford asks how these these fantasy gallery views are made. All the original drawings are straight HTML using Dreamweaver- that's why they're so flat, hard-edged, and simple. These gallery views are of course made with Photoshop, heavy on the use of layers and the gradation tool.

Karin: see 010803 for an explanation of how I am flipping one day ahead. Yes, so far most of the galleries are invented. However, 011603 is built over a picture of a room I scavenged somewhere, and 011803 will also use another image of a room (that gallery view, by the way, is already finished and awaiting the Saturday flip on Friday afternoon). It's all pretty crude; I won't be sending my resume to Pixar anytime soon.

I'm pleased that others (KK, IM, RY, CY) like these gallery views, as I like them, too, a lot. They bring a real satisfaction to me. The scale of these depictions may not be as I have usually pictured some of them, but I do almost always also think of these table drawing thingies as being made of real materials and hanging on a real wall. I've talked enough about looking at a paintings that I'm surprised no one else really made the kind of connection I've been carrying around inside my head. But that's inside my head, not yours, so I shouldn't be surprised, I guess.

I just noticed how I keep calling these things "table drawings," yet in my head as I've used them in these gallery depictions they are paintings. That's a clue for me as one difference between the digital media and the real material. Drawing in HTML is mostly dealing in defining edges, boundaries, which is drawing. Then the shape is filled with color. In painting the action can be about line, but it's also about volume and surface and thickness. It's tactile in a way the HTML drawings can't be. That may be why I can't call these things table paintings. By can't, I mean that when I start to say it my brain stops me. I feel a difference and am forced to use the word "drawing."

*

Say what? "Scientist: Bananas Face Serious Threat from Disease!" Why, I eat a banana nearly every day, and I hope to live much longer than ten more years. What's this all about?

*

L'il calendar to more easily jump back in the archives-

2001 J F M A M J
  J A S O N D
2002 J F M A M J
  J A S O N D

Say...


The opinions or statements expressed herein should not be taken as a position of or endorsement by the University of California, Berkeley. Nor should the opinions or statements expressed herein be taken as a position of or endorsement of the University of California, Berkeley. Links on these pages to commercial sites do not represent endorsement by the University of California or its affiliates.

[© Christopher Ashley]

Archives
January 2003
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 

Dec   Feb

home
HTMLdrawings
~ ~ ~
aboutHTMLdrawings
portfolio
(external site)
writings
readings
weblogs
IU
links
whoami
LookSee
an artblog
AtWork
a workblog


Readers may leave a comment


This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
since 111702
Powered by counter.bloke.com